| SWPA BotsIQ 2011 | |
|
+10jtm94 rjw Don Doerfler jakerheimer marsh368 Cody Frisco Stephen Mr. P Koolaid64 14 posters |
|
Author | Message |
---|
Koolaid64 mega contributor
People Skills : 5928 Registration date : 2009-07-05 Age : 33 Location : PA
| Subject: Re: SWPA BotsIQ 2011 Mon Mar 28, 2011 12:41 am | |
| and thats why i prefer my robotics experience to have little to no affiliation with schools
or for that matter an sporting activity. schools seam to corrupt the fun of it some how | |
|
| |
Mr. P
People Skills : 4941 Registration date : 2010-12-18 Age : 40 Location : Pittsburgh
| Subject: Re: SWPA BotsIQ 2011 Mon Mar 28, 2011 10:18 am | |
| since this is all different than what Carmen told me day of, where does bot 12 in your bracket fight? I believe there will be some changes made day off so I am not setting anything in stone.
| |
|
| |
Stephen super contributor
People Skills : 5615 Registration date : 2009-11-01 Age : 29 Location : West Mifflin
| Subject: Re: SWPA BotsIQ 2011 Mon Mar 28, 2011 10:58 am | |
| - Alex wrote:
- Mr. P wrote:
- since this is all different than what Carmen told me day of, where does bot 12 in your bracket fight? I believe there will be some changes made day off so I am not setting anything in stone.
Mike A and Greg Chambers told me that it was going to be seeded 1 vs 12 (like it is supposed to be) on Friday, but Mike V. made a big deal about the 2 vs 3 on saturday.
I don't know where 12 goes lol. no what i have been hearing was its 1 gets bye 2 vs 3 4 gets bye 5 vs 6 7 gets bye 8 vs 9 10 gets bye 11 vs 12 and this makes more sense with the 12 bots to | |
|
| |
Stephen super contributor
People Skills : 5615 Registration date : 2009-11-01 Age : 29 Location : West Mifflin
| Subject: Re: SWPA BotsIQ 2011 Mon Mar 28, 2011 11:08 am | |
| and that makes it even more flawed because really you could lose whenever u want and figure out exactly where u want ur self so u can get a bye and fight the more wrecked up bots at the bottom of the bracket | |
|
| |
Frisco super contributor
People Skills : 5714 Registration date : 2009-11-01 Age : 52 Location : Brownsville, Pennsylvania
| Subject: Re: SWPA BotsIQ 2011 Mon Mar 28, 2011 11:15 am | |
|
Last edited by Frisco on Mon Mar 28, 2011 1:30 pm; edited 1 time in total | |
|
| |
Frisco super contributor
People Skills : 5714 Registration date : 2009-11-01 Age : 52 Location : Brownsville, Pennsylvania
| Subject: Re: SWPA BotsIQ 2011 Mon Mar 28, 2011 11:19 am | |
| Steve Drove the Drum (Kv) and Jake drove Under U | |
|
| |
Cody 2000+ club
People Skills : 7812 Registration date : 2009-03-16
| Subject: Re: SWPA BotsIQ 2011 Mon Mar 28, 2011 1:00 pm | |
| They used to have there comittee meeting at PSNK and would invite me to attend, it was these types of things that they would ask me and a would go on to tell them why it was such a terrible idea | |
|
| |
Cody 2000+ club
People Skills : 7812 Registration date : 2009-03-16
| Subject: Re: SWPA BotsIQ 2011 Mon Mar 28, 2011 1:27 pm | |
| I guess I should've said when I was at PSNK. They just care about getting teams into it so when teams come in with a lexan bot that gets blown up and dont want to be part of it next year its hurting them. They could care less about the progression of the bots or anything else. They would rather have new teams with new kids rather then have Plum or West Mifflin etc. come back next year | |
|
| |
marsh368
People Skills : 5396 Registration date : 2009-09-09 Age : 58 Location : Bloomsburg, PA
| Subject: Re: SWPA BotsIQ 2011 Mon Mar 28, 2011 3:26 pm | |
| The system should randomly select the robots for the bracket. A seeding system is totally flawed and could be used by teams smart enough to exploit them.
Getting the same number of points to win in the loser bracket is also insane. There should be a different set of number so the early rounds are worth a lower number and it climbs as wins are racked up. If you are really ranking the robots, then that should influence the points earned. Why should a team that beats an 11th placed ranked robot earn the same points as a team that might knock off the top seeded team. This is really messed up system.
Give points per round. The loser brackets earn points, but not as many as the winners bracket. The points combined with the interview and document would determine the overall winner. If you base it all on points earned, then any team with a bye should earn full points for that round just like they earned a win. Since a bye, essentially is a win... just not against an opponent.
Just my two cents... Random bracket... points could be based on the rounds advanced. Loser bracket is worth 1/3 the points for a winners bracket. Byes count as full points...
Good luck with this ... I hope the rest of the NTMA does not follow this lead.
| |
|
| |
jakerheimer
People Skills : 4813 Registration date : 2011-03-27 Age : 28 Location : West mifflin
| Subject: Re: SWPA BotsIQ 2011 Mon Mar 28, 2011 8:29 pm | |
| i agree the way they have the brackets now is just stupid and teams can easily place themselves where it gives them the best advantage in the brackets ... i say randomize it - marsh368 wrote:
- The system should randomly select the robots for the bracket. A seeding system is totally flawed and could be used by teams smart enough to exploit them.
Getting the same number of points to win in the loser bracket is also insane. There should be a different set of number so the early rounds are worth a lower number and it climbs as wins are racked up. If you are really ranking the robots, then that should influence the points earned. Why should a team that beats an 11th placed ranked robot earn the same points as a team that might knock off the top seeded team. This is really messed up system.
Give points per round. The loser brackets earn points, but not as many as the winners bracket. The points combined with the interview and document would determine the overall winner. If you base it all on points earned, then any team with a bye should earn full points for that round just like they earned a win. Since a bye, essentially is a win... just not against an opponent.
Just my two cents... Random bracket... points could be based on the rounds advanced. Loser bracket is worth 1/3 the points for a winners bracket. Byes count as full points...
Good luck with this ... I hope the rest of the NTMA does not follow this lead.
| |
|
| |
Don Doerfler super contributor
People Skills : 5637 Registration date : 2009-12-24 Age : 29 Location : Plum,Pa
| Subject: Re: SWPA BotsIQ 2011 Mon Mar 28, 2011 9:46 pm | |
| I agree that the competition is basically rigged and is just unfair why should it be any different from any other competiton | |
|
| |
Frisco super contributor
People Skills : 5714 Registration date : 2009-11-01 Age : 52 Location : Brownsville, Pennsylvania
| Subject: Re: SWPA BotsIQ 2011 Mon Mar 28, 2011 10:18 pm | |
| Ahhhh Lay off guys...
I do believe they are trying to make it better, They are just going the wrong direction with a few things and taking other things a little further than they need to be...
They want to let first year schools have a better experience but took a step further than they need to.
They want to have a pre run for tune ups which they did and they wanted it to mean something which they did but they just went a step further than they needed to.
They are thinking about a fall tournament as a fundraiser which is a good idea.
They do get scholarships, start up money, organize and put up with the stupid stuff...
If you would see some of the paperwork you would agree with what they are doing with the documentation..
I agree with about 85% of what they do but like I said just a little too far sometimes...
This bracket direction.... well I think most of you know what I think but who knows what it will actually be... Things might have been said but nothing has been released as of yet.
Frisco | |
|
| |
Stephen super contributor
People Skills : 5615 Registration date : 2009-11-01 Age : 29 Location : West Mifflin
| Subject: Re: SWPA BotsIQ 2011 Tue Mar 29, 2011 10:37 pm | |
| where is this being held now i keep forgetting
| |
|
| |
Don Doerfler super contributor
People Skills : 5637 Registration date : 2009-12-24 Age : 29 Location : Plum,Pa
| Subject: Re: SWPA BotsIQ 2011 Tue Mar 29, 2011 10:39 pm | |
| - Stephen wrote:
- where is this being held now i keep forgetting
westmorland college | |
|
| |
Stephen super contributor
People Skills : 5615 Registration date : 2009-11-01 Age : 29 Location : West Mifflin
| Subject: Re: SWPA BotsIQ 2011 Tue Mar 29, 2011 10:45 pm | |
| yah thanks i have always called it the mall competition so i keep forgetting where its at lol | |
|
| |
rjw Chief Bottle Washer
People Skills : 7765 Registration date : 2009-03-31 Location : Miami
| Subject: Re: SWPA BotsIQ 2011 Fri Apr 15, 2011 1:17 pm | |
| good luck to everyone credits to Alex and Cody Hopefully someone will post updates as they occur | |
|
| |
Mr. P
People Skills : 4941 Registration date : 2010-12-18 Age : 40 Location : Pittsburgh
| Subject: SWPA Botsiq Fri Apr 15, 2011 5:09 pm | |
| news coming in. Plum ( atomic) loser bracket. Plum ( shocker ) also loser bracket. This is the news I been getting by phone calls. Did not see it. almost don't believe it, But has been confirmed by Alex through text. its looking like the march madness bracket. It's all busted up.... | |
|
| |
rjw Chief Bottle Washer
People Skills : 7765 Registration date : 2009-03-31 Location : Miami
| Subject: Re: SWPA BotsIQ 2011 Fri Apr 15, 2011 7:35 pm | |
| | |
|
| |
jtm94 great contributor
People Skills : 5379 Registration date : 2010-04-23 Age : 29 Location : Clairton, PA
| Subject: Re: SWPA BotsIQ 2011 Fri Apr 15, 2011 10:38 pm | |
| I didn't get any good video and I was too engrossed in the better fights to try and record. as in Black Mamba(Admiral Perry) vs. Propel Atomic vs Hempfield (what an upset) Shocker vs Belle Vernon (wasn't that interesting, but I wanted to see the outcome) | |
|
| |
jtm94 great contributor
People Skills : 5379 Registration date : 2010-04-23 Age : 29 Location : Clairton, PA
| Subject: Re: SWPA BotsIQ 2011 Fri Apr 15, 2011 10:53 pm | |
| So....I did have a nice sized reply but the forum ate it... I know no one really cares, but we got our robot mini nuke running better for what it is and we would have gone a lot farther, but we faced a good robot(black Mamba). It wasn't too cute of a fight.
Our other team's robot showed a lot of promise, but they lost after chewing up propel when they were unable to move back to their starting position. The arena was still not good and I think it should be a lot better. Because of the arena there were a lot of slow fights, but there was still more action than the prelims because people tried to adapt to this.
If you don't have a two wheel drive robot and you have clearance less than 1/4 inch then you were destined to get stuck.
Black Mamba fixed their teeth to not shatter as fast and they came with A LOT more weapons.
I think the volunteers could have been better informed of a few things like where they were doing the speed test(we walked around for 10 minutes), but that's no big deal.
The projector screens were viewable this time! No matter where you were in the gym you had a great view of the fight.
I look forward to tomorrow and good luck to everyone else! | |
|
| |
Don Doerfler super contributor
People Skills : 5637 Registration date : 2009-12-24 Age : 29 Location : Plum,Pa
| Subject: Re: SWPA BotsIQ 2011 Fri Apr 15, 2011 11:04 pm | |
| - Ctown_ftw wrote:
- I didn't get any good video and I was too engrossed in the better fights to try and record.
as in Black Mamba(Admiral Perry) vs. Propel Atomic vs Hempfield (what an upset) Shocker vs Belle Vernon (wasn't that interesting, but I wanted to see the outcome) yah the controls on atomic were all messed up | |
|
| |
jtm94 great contributor
People Skills : 5379 Registration date : 2010-04-23 Age : 29 Location : Clairton, PA
| Subject: Re: SWPA BotsIQ 2011 Fri Apr 15, 2011 11:10 pm | |
| Something was up. I enjoyed it though You guys were there for SO long before you fought and have had the robot. Our robot still wasn't done going in and usually when we fight is the first time we get to test it. People just expected more. | |
|
| |
Don Doerfler super contributor
People Skills : 5637 Registration date : 2009-12-24 Age : 29 Location : Plum,Pa
| Subject: Re: SWPA BotsIQ 2011 Fri Apr 15, 2011 11:13 pm | |
| well we tested atomic like 3 times and all of a sudden it wouldnt turn on | |
|
| |
jtm94 great contributor
People Skills : 5379 Registration date : 2010-04-23 Age : 29 Location : Clairton, PA
| Subject: Re: SWPA BotsIQ 2011 Fri Apr 15, 2011 11:33 pm | |
| No good.
Oh! Another good fight was team Back in Black with the Grime Reaper vs the Black Mamba It was the only time I ever saw Black Mamba's armor get touched and it got a chunk taken out. They have a back up and were planning on welding it so they suffered no significant loss, but now the loser's bracket just got a lot harder. | |
|
| |
jtm94 great contributor
People Skills : 5379 Registration date : 2010-04-23 Age : 29 Location : Clairton, PA
| Subject: Re: SWPA BotsIQ 2011 Sat Apr 16, 2011 6:43 am | |
| - Quote :
- Tons of weapon that are sub par....i saw a drum today that used 8-32 cap head screws for a weapon
Was that the "drum" that was only 3/4inch in diameter if it was lucky?? In my opinion if some of the other teams had good weapon motors their weapons would be able to deal out some damage despite the possibility of breaking their weapon. | |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: SWPA BotsIQ 2011 | |
| |
|
| |
| SWPA BotsIQ 2011 | |
|